For foreign relations historians, causality is a central concern. Championing the Palestinian cause, a ubiquitous concern throughout the Middle-East, garnered legitimacy for the Iranian regime in the Sunni Arab world, which had little appetite for Iranian nationalism or Shia Islamism.
This is exemplified by the US Embassy hostage crisis, where 90 American hostages were held by radical supporters of Khomeini for days. The alliances with Syria and the Palestinian nationalist group Fatah were founded on pragmatism; they shared an antipathy to the West and Israel, but, as pan-Arab secular socialists, neither the Syrian regime nor Fatah constituted ideological bedfellows of an Islamic-nationalist Shia regime.
At the same time, however, renewed scholarly interest in ideology and the continuing debate over its significance has revealed the difficulties the concept entails. Which is why, in an Alice in Wonderland twist, neocon-hating liberals have become neoconservatism's true heirs.
As Geertz has pointed out, events unfold within the bounds of culture, which is open to interpretation. Email This column was written by Peter Beinart Virtually no one still believes that the United States can quickly impose democracy in foreign lands.
Moreover, it is likely that practical considerations would have prevented the plan from progressing beyond the conference table.
It seems reasonable to conclude that some periods of American history proved more ideological than others, and that some administrations were more influenced by it than others.
Moreover, the experience of the United States in the Third World reveals clearly how difficult it is to understand the role of ideology and how ambiguous that role can be. Yet despite these complexities, we should not too quickly consign ideology to the scholarly rubbish heap.
Building on previous trends, Tehran sought to equate the survival of the regime and victor over Iraq with the national honour of Iran. This relationship originates with the Islamic Revolution ofwhich blended Islamism with pre-existing pragmatic-nationalist foreign policy dogma. To ignore ideology in the context of the Cold War is, in some respects, to miss the point.
Must we see ideology as little more than a cynical tool of justification? The following chapter on the problem of self-representation compares the uses of reading and writing in Seneca, Marcus Aurelius, and Augustine, who alike see these activities not as ends in themselves, but as a means to make a better person.
The Cold War rivalry arose over the traditional problems of creating a stable postwar settlement and in particular finding a solution for the instability of central Europe. The Cold War was not only a classic political power struggle, but neither was it a purely ideological conflict.
For Kennedy, a surprise attack on Cuba did not fit his image of the United States, and this policy option was quickly ruled out.Political Ideology Essays (Examples) Aside from the practical considerations provided by the system which split the federal and local authorities, there was also the matter of the limitation of powers.
The Operational Consequences of Chinese Foreign Policy The World Views and China (Beijing consensus) Expatriates.
Free Essay: Practical Considerations Outweighed Ideology in Foreign Policy in Relation to Germany from Adolf Hitler was made Chancellor of Germany. Book Review Ideology And Us Foreign Policy History Essay.
Print Reference this this viewpoint which inherently criticises Williams’ viewpoint on Ideology in relation to Foreign Policy, is convincing and intriguing to the reader, Hunt’s critique of both works in the first chapter as well as a discussion with about the term Ideology is.
Practical Considerations Outweighed Ideology in Foreign Policy in Relation to Germany from - Practical Considerations Outweighed Ideology in Foreign Policy in Relation to Germany from Adolf Hitler was made Chancellor of Germany inand had a practical set of objectives on how to re-establish Germany as a super power once again.
For it is the nature of ideology to preconceive reality." The ideology that worried The Public Interest's editors most was excessive faith in government's capacity to solve entrenched social problems. A close study of the period shows us the importance of ideology in foreign policy.
To ignore ideology in the context of the Cold War is, in some respects, to miss the point. It would have been a dangerous move. Moreover, it is likely that practical considerations would have prevented the plan from progressing beyond the conference table.Download